College admissions officers, administrators, counselors and
students are waiting with bated breath for the Supreme Court’s decision on a
case heard earlier this year. Fischer v. University of Texas is a suit brought
against the University by a student who was denied admission. Admission to UT is
guaranteed to Texas residents who graduate from a Texas high school in the top
10% of the class; beyond that group, admissions is holistic, considering all
the stuff we already know all colleges consider in the admissions process. The plaintiff alleges that her Caucasian
race put her at a disadvantage for admission, as the University
seeks greater diversity on campus. The case asks that the court declare the
admissions policy of the University inconsistent with another related case, Grutter v.
Bollinger, or overrule it in its entirety. Grutter v. Bollinger is a
2003 case in which the Supreme Court ruled that race could play a limited role
in the admissions policies of public universities. An overruling of Grutter
could end conscious affirmative action policies in admissions at U.S. public
universities.
In a lower court decision, it was ruled that Fischer’s race
could be taken into account when her candidacy was reviewed. In the Grutter decision, it was stated
that sorting applicants by race, forbidden in any other public entity, was
permissible in public university admissions. While many private colleges and
universities have expressed a preference for a diverse campus, and make
admissions decisions based on those preferences, they are private institutions
and can, to some extent, do as they please. Publics need to acknowledge their
admissions standards and defend their legality when challenged.
So, a student who self-identifies on an application that he
or she is an under- represented minority may be given preference over a student
who chose not to check the box indicating ethnicity, or indicated that he or
she is Caucasian. What does this mean for the typical American high school
student who is applying to a public university? Does it mean that Common App forms
for public universities won't have a space anymore to indicate ethnicity or
minority status? Maybe. Does it mean that public universities that are
committed to a diverse student body will find other ways for students to
self-identify? Maybe. Or does it mean that the playing field is completely
level now and every student, regardless of color, race, or birthplace will be
considered solely on his or her academic merits when applying to a public
university, diversity be damned? Is this a good thing? A bad thing? Who knows?
No comments:
Post a Comment